Split a single particle down two paths and recombine them, and where it lands depends on both paths, including the one you can prove it never took.

The Mach-Zehnder interferometer is the cleanest hardware for the central puzzle of quantum mechanics. A beam splitter, a half-silvered mirror, sends light down two separate paths, ordinary mirrors bring the paths back together at a second beam splitter, and two detectors wait at the two exits. Which detector fires depends on the difference between the two path lengths, as the light travelling each path arrives as a wave, and the two waves either reinforce or cancel at each exit according to how far out of step the two paths have put them. This is interference, and so far it's classical optics.
Now dim the source until only one particle of light, one photon, is in flight at a time, and the interference stays. A single photon's arrival statistics depend on both paths at once, and if you block either path the interference dies instantly, replaced by a fifty-fifty split between the detectors.
Every hard question about quantum mechanics can be staged in this box, such as what happened in between the splitters, whether there was a path, and when the outcome was decided. That's why the instrument appears in every foundations argument since 1892.
This is the standard arena for the interference experiments among the programme's empirical twins, the flagship experiments CSD's machine-checked corpus reproduces as pass-or-fail tests, as the bomb tester and the quantum eraser both live inside it. Its value is diagnostic, as it forces any account of quantum mechanics to say something definite about the alternative that wasn't measured, which is precisely where interpretations stop agreeing.
The eraser variant is the sharpest instrument in the set. Recording which path the particle took destroys the interference, and discarding that record afterwards restores it, so any story in which the particle simply took one definite path has real explaining to do about the restoration. CSD's account runs through the structure of regions in its state space rather than through stories about paths, and reproducing both twins is treated as a pass-or-fail constraint and not decoration.
Two balanced beam splitters and two paths, with output intensities set by the relative phase between the arms.
Unlike the Michelson layout, the paths are spatially separated and traversed once, which is what makes arm-specific interventions (blockers, detectors, erasers) cleanly statable, and hence what makes it the canonical which-path laboratory.
Ludwig Zehnder (1854-1949), a Swiss physicist with a doctorate under Rontgen at Wurzburg, published the design in 1891, and Ludwig Mach (1868-1951) refined it independently in 1892. Neither had quantum mechanics in mind, as the instrument was built for measuring refractive indices.
The younger Mach was the son of Ernst Mach, whose positivism, the doctrine that only what's observable is real, shaped Einstein and the Vienna Circle. There's a neat irony in the son's instrument becoming, a century later, the standard stage for arguments about whether unobserved paths are real, and the father would have had opinions.
Source links are pinned to a commit, so they do not drift. The anchors above are checked mechanically against the Lean tree on every build. The mathematics is not, and cannot be: that is a human responsibility and it rests with the author.
Part of Constraint-Surface Dynamics · Formalised in csd-lean4.
Google Analytics counts visits to this page, which stores cookies in your browser. They record how the page was reached, not who you are, and nothing is passed on. Blocking cookies for this site breaks nothing here. Details.